PoliVion
Who's who

The Pro-Israel PACs, Explained

AIPAC isn’t the only pro-Israel group spending in these races. Here’s who the others are, which lane each one runs in, and what the colors on our candidate cards mean.

The color key: what the card colors mean

Every money line on a PoliVion candidate card is color-coded by whose money it is:

Card colors and what they mean
ColorMeaningCard line looks like
RedAIPAC money. Direct contributions from AIPAC’s PAC or routed through AIPAC, documented in FEC filings.AIPAC $X
OrangeMulti-group total. Combined pro-Israel lobby money from several groups (AIPAC plus others) — labeled separately, never presented as AIPAC-only.Pro-Israel lobby total $X
YellowOther pro-Israel PACs. Money from pro-Israel PACs other than AIPAC — J Street, JAC, DMFI, NORPAC, and the rest below. No AIPAC-linked record was found.Other pro-Israel PACs $X
TealUDP. Backing or opposing via the United Democracy Project’s independent expenditures — outside spending, not donations.UDP $X backing / opposing

The big players

Five groups dominate the pro-Israel money in federal races. They differ in two ways that matter: what kind of vehicle they are (PAC vs. super PAC), and which lane they run in.

The five big pro-Israel spending vehicles
GroupKindLaneIn plain language
AIPAC PACTraditional PACBipartisan establishmentThe lobbying group’s own PAC. Gives directly to candidates, subject to federal contribution limits. Red on our cards.
United Democracy ProjectSuper PACAIPAC-alignedAIPAC’s super PAC. Unlimited independent expenditures; cannot coordinate with campaigns. Purple on our cards.
DMFI PACPACDemocratic establishmentDemocratic Majority for Israel, founded 2019. Elects pro-Israel Democrats and works to defeat anti-Israel Democrats, in its own words. Often backs the same candidates as AIPAC, with overlapping donors.
Republican Jewish Coalition Victory FundSuper PACRepublicanThe RJC’s super PAC arm. Independent expenditures supporting Republican candidates.
J Street PACPACProgressive / pro-peaceCalls itself “pro-Israel, pro-peace.” Backs diplomacy and a two-state solution; sometimes supports candidates AIPAC opposes — the dovish counterweight in the pro-Israel world.

PAC vs. super PAC, in one sentence: a traditional PAC gives money directly to candidates within federal limits; a super PAC spends unlimited amounts independently — ads and outreach it runs itself, without coordinating with any campaign.

The traditional pro-Israel PACs

Beyond the big five, a set of long-running PACs raises and bundles donations for pro-Israel candidates — mostly through direct contributions:

JAC (Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs). Active since 1981. Backs candidates who support the U.S.-Israel relationship and a progressive domestic agenda — reproductive rights, gun reform, church-state separation. Describes itself as bipartisan; most of its money goes to Democrats.

NORPAC. New Jersey-based, bipartisan. Raises funds for members of Congress who support a strong U.S.-Israel relationship, and runs an annual mission to Washington. Sits on the more hawkish end of the pro-Israel spectrum.

JDCA (Jewish Democratic Council of America). Pro-Israel Democratic group backing Democratic candidates.

Smaller and regional pro-Israel PACs — Friends of Israel PAC, Pro-Israel America, U.S. Israel PAC, and others in the full list below — show up in individual candidates’ FEC filings in smaller amounts.

Every PAC in our data

Every pro-Israel PAC abbreviation that appears in our candidate money notes, with full names where documented. Name expansions for the smaller PACs follow TrackAIPAC’s published key of pro-Israel PACs.

Pro-Israel PACs appearing in PoliVion's 2026 data
Abbr.Full nameNotes
AIPACAmerican Israel Public Affairs Committee (PAC)The lobbying group's traditional PAC. Red on our cards.
UDPUnited Democracy ProjectAIPAC's super PAC. Purple on our cards. (Explainer)
DMFIDemocratic Majority for Israel (PAC)Democratic establishment lane; founded 2019.
RJCRepublican Jewish Coalition (Victory Fund)Republican lane; Victory Fund is the super PAC arm.
JSTREETJ Street PACProgressive / pro-peace lane.
JACJoint Action Committee for Political AffairsPro-Israel + progressive domestic agenda; active since 1981.
NORPACNORPAC (formerly North Jersey PAC)Bipartisan; New Jersey-based.
JDCAJewish Democratic Council of AmericaPro-Israel Democratic group.
PIAPro-Israel America PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
USIU.S. Israel PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
FIPACFriends of Israel PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
AUSDAmericans United in Support of DemocracySmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
BICPACBecause I Care PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
CAJDCalifornia Jewish DemocratsRegional pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
GCSCGrand Canyon State CaucusRegional pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
LFASLouisianans for American Security PACRegional pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
MDACCMaryland Association for Concerned Citizens PACRegional pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
MSTDMainstream Democrats PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
TPOHTo Protect Our Heritage PACSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
AGGAmericans for Good GovernmentSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
AMPAmerican PrinciplesSmaller pro-Israel PAC (name per TrackAIPAC).
Also appearing in FEC filings compiled by TrackAIPAC (independent public descriptions not verified; listed for completeness): BICOUNTY, CITY, CITYPAC, COPAC, DESERT, DJOPA, DVPAC, GFC, HAPAC, HEARTLAND, HVPAC, LIPAC, MMPAC, MOPAC, NACPAC, NATPAC, PHXED, SUNPAC, WAFI, WAPAC, BBF.

Group descriptions draw on the groups’ own public statements, Wikipedia, and news reporting; smaller-PAC name expansions follow TrackAIPAC’s published key. Money figures on candidate cards come from FEC filings via FundVoter and TrackAIPAC. If we’ve mischaracterized a group, tell us and we’ll correct it.

Why this matters

“Pro-Israel money” isn’t one thing. AIPAC’s direct contributions (red), the multi-group totals (orange), the other PACs (yellow), and UDP’s independent expenditures (teal) are different vehicles, different lanes, and different legal mechanisms — and they don’t always pull in the same direction. J Street sometimes backs the candidates AIPAC opposes. DMFI polices Democrats from the center while JAC pulls from the progressive side. Lumping them together — or treating “no AIPAC money” as “no pro-Israel money” — misses how the ecosystem actually works.

Frequently asked questions

What’s the difference between a PAC and a super PAC?

A traditional PAC gives money directly to candidates, subject to federal contribution limits. A super PAC can raise and spend unlimited amounts, but only on independent expenditures — ads and outreach it runs itself, without coordinating with any campaign.

Is J Street anti-Israel?

No. J Street describes itself as pro-Israel and pro-peace, backing a two-state solution through diplomacy. It is criticized from the right as anti-Israel and from the left as too supportive of Israel.

Does a yellow label mean the candidate opposes AIPAC?

No. Yellow means no AIPAC-linked contributions were found in FEC records — the candidate received money from other pro-Israel PACs instead, like J Street, JAC, or DMFI.

Why are there so many different pro-Israel PACs?

The pro-Israel donor world is split by party and ideology: establishment vs. progressive, Democratic vs. Republican, hawkish vs. pro-diplomacy. Each lane has its own vehicles — which is why one candidate can show money from half a dozen different groups.

Key

Documented fact — sourced from FEC filings, official records, news reporting, or the group’s own public statements.

Their stated rationale — what the group itself says its reasons are; not our assessment of them.

PoliVion analysis — our read of what the documented facts add up to.

See the money on the cards

Browse all 470 races with every candidate’s pro-Israel funding, color-coded.

View all midterm elections → Back to the strategy page